David Warren Lloyd -- editorial column
  David Warren Lloyd's webfolio  
  • editorial column
SEE Magazine
MA thesis
IASPM paper
resume & publications
• contact
• home
Like it is

22 June, 2006
What's a hippie?

This month I spent a whole week at North Country Fair, an outdoor camping music festival near Driftpile, Alberta. I put in more than 30 hours of volunteer work, earning myself a free ticket and free meals.

On the last day of the Fair, a friend said "It's nice to see so many hippies in Alberta. I had no idea there were so many!" I agreed; it was nice. Then I thought, "What is a hippie?" The original hippie days were before my time, but yet people still use the term.

In the late '90s my friends and I spent many Saturday nights at a nightclub downtown, dancing, drinking, and being driven home by the designated driver (usually me). A lot of people there called me "Hippie Dave". This was odd because I certainly didn't do drugs, wear tie-dye, have poor hygiene, engage in "free love", live on a commune, or listen to the Grateful Dead. These days a different group of people call someone else—far more hippie than me, apparently—"Hippie Dave", and just call me Dave Lloyd.

But I haven't changed that much. The difference is in the context. The first group of people wasn't very hippie-ish. The second is. So, what makes a hippie? When people want to insult and discredit others, and they say "Oh, they're just a bunch of hippies", why is that an insult?

Is it because hippies do drugs? Maybe some do, but plenty of non-hippie people also do drugs. Plus, many hippies are too health conscious to do drugs. Anyway, I don't really see drug use as a moral issue. To me, morality concerns three questions: Do you harm people in any way, directly or indirectly? Do you contribute to your community? Do you keep your promises? People have the right to harm themselves. If they do so without breaking those tenets, then the only problem is the legality. So does that mean that alcoholics are committing no sin because alcohol is legal?

"Illicit" drugs are a legal issue, but the roots of that go years back to persecuting largely immigrant drug users than controlling the substances. Alcohol and tobacco are sold by rich old white guys, illicit substances by young poor people of many races. (Also, many believe that loads of rich white Americans obtained their wealth by involvement with illicit drug sales.)

No, most "illicit" drugs are just as bad as alcohol, tobacco, and the flood of pharmaceuticals that are legal today. For that reason, and because they're illegal, I strongly recommend against using illicit substances. But the link between those substances and hippies is tenuous.

Maybe hippies are bad because they're lazy or smell bad. I've been on medical unemployment (because our medical system couldn't—and still can't—diagnose my chronic pain), and I didn't see many hippies in the line-ups. And has anyone seen the proliferation of "Please stop wearing colognes and perfumes at work" signs? Are those aimed at hippies?

No, I think a hippie is someone who has a live-and-let-live, truly free perspective. I don't think they're a big problem. Yes, many of them seem to have read Ernie Zelinski's {The Joy of Not Working}, but that's why so many of them are happy and healthy. Yes, many protest environmental damage and corporate rule, but that's just an extension of "live and let live", a defense of people's right to clean air, water, and food.

The problem is with those who force others to live certain ways, to love certain people, and to think certain things. And who needlessly pollute our planet.

So peace, dude.

[top]


 




Content and design of this web site ©2004 David Warren Lloyd